24th January 2018, 2:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 24th January 2018, 2:11 AM by aaaaaa123456789. Edited 1 time in total.)
(23rd January 2018, 8:29 AM)Robobot Wrote: the 10x claim isn't true, it's more of an exaggeration, however if you fully read the article, you'll find some very very interesting information, I'd ask you to fully read it and not just try to find one specific point. Thank you.
I hope you can tell by yourself how weak your claims look when you retreat and say "the [...] claim isn't true" as soon as someone says that your claim isn't backed by your sources. It's no better than the typical "haha, I was just trolling" rebuttal.
The study makes a very strong case against mixing marijuana and alcohol, and otherwise says that the effects of marijuana alone are easier to compensate when in small doses than those of alcohol. It doesn't say that driving under the influence of either is safe. The amount of alcohol you can legally drink before driving in most places is very limited, far below the values used in that study (in some places and in some cases it's restricted to as little as zero), so the comparison does not apply.
(The values used as lower bounds in that study, as far as I can tell, are 0.08% BAC and 0.75 g/kg. Those values are around twice the legal limit here.)
